Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2021-02-22 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Black, Gold and Gray |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 has a general score of 88.1, which is much better than Moto Z Force's global score of 75.8. Galaxy F62's body is noticeably newer, but way heavier and notably thicker than Moto Z Force. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS, but Galaxy F62 has older 11 version while Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat.
Galaxy F62 has a little faster CPU than Moto Z Force, and although they both have a Quad-Core processor, the Galaxy F62 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher count of pixels per inch in the display and a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution.
Galaxy F62 features a better camera than Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the same video frame rates and a F1.8 camera aperture, the Galaxy F62 also has a lot better 64 mega pixels resolution camera in the back. The Samsung Galaxy F62 features a little bit better memory to install games and applications than Moto Z Force, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy F62 has a superior battery performance than Moto Z Force, because it has a 7000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.