Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-02-22 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy F62 has a general score of 88.1, which is better than Moto Z2 Force Edition's overall score of 77.4. Although the Samsung Galaxy F62 is way newer than the Moto Z2 Force Edition, it is notably thicker and incredibly heavier. Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy F62, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better screen pixel density and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition features a bit better CPU than Galaxy F62, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a larger number of cores. Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with just a bit bigger memory for apps and games than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage.
The Galaxy F62 has a way better battery lifetime than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 156% bigger battery size. The Samsung Galaxy F62 takes much clearer pictures and videos than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a larger camera aperture to take better images and videos in low light situations, a much larger back camera sensor shooting lot better quality videos and photos and a camera in the back with a lot higher 64 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.