Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2021-02-22 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 is much better than the Motorola Moto Z3, getting a general score of 88.1 against 77.6. Galaxy F62's construction is newer, but noticeably heavier and incredibly thicker than the Motorola Moto Z3. These devices have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy F62 has the previous 11 version and Motorola Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Samsung Galaxy F62 features a slightly better looking screen than Motorola Moto Z3, because although it has a bit lower pixels amount in each inch of screen, it also counts with a little bigger display and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400. Galaxy F62 features a bit bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Moto Z3, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Motorola Moto Z3 has just a little better processing power than Galaxy F62, because although it has less RAM memory, it also counts with 4 more cores. Galaxy F62 counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a 133 percent bigger battery size. Samsung Galaxy F62 takes greater photographs and videos than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a way larger back camera sensor taking way higher quality videos and photographs, a bigger camera aperture for better low-light images and a back facing camera with way more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.