Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-02-22 | 2021-01-14 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | LTPS |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy F62 is a bit better than the Motorola One 5G Ace, having an 88.1 score against 81.6. Although the Samsung Galaxy F62 and Motorola One 5G Ace were only released 1 months apart, the Samsung Galaxy F62 design is a little bit heavier but just a little bit thinner. Samsung Galaxy F62 features a little better processing power than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has less cores (although they are faster), it also counts with 2 GB more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a bit better screen than Motorola One 5G Ace. Both of them have the same amount of pixels in each inch of screen, a same size display and the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Galaxy F62 has a better storage for games and applications than Motorola One 5G Ace, and although they both have a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1 TB, the Galaxy F62 also has more internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy F62 takes clearer photographs and videos than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also counts with a back facing camera with much more MP.
Samsung Galaxy F62 has a much longer battery duration than Motorola One 5G Ace, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.