Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 is better than the Motorola One Hyper, getting an 88.1 score against 79.8. Both devices in this comparison review use the same Android 11 OS, so they should provide identical OS features. The Galaxy F62 body is newer than Motorola One Hyper's, although it's just a little heavier and a bit thicker.
Samsung Galaxy F62 features a little bit better looking display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a bit less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a little bit bigger display and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400. The Samsung Galaxy F62 has a bit better processor than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has an inferior number of cores , it also counts with 2 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy F62 features just a bit more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy F62 also has an external SD slot that supports up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a bit better camera than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have a 64 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a bigger diafragm aperture.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a superior battery lifetime than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a 7000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.