Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-02-22 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Blue and Brown |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 is just a bit better than the Motorola One Vision, having a overall score of 88.1 against 80.7. Although the Galaxy F62 is newer than Motorola One Vision, it is just a little thicker and somewhat heavier. Galaxy F62 features a little faster CPU than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with 2 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy F62 features a bit sharper screen than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a quite worse screen density and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a quite larger screen. Samsung Galaxy F62 features just a bit bigger memory for games and applications than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy F62 counts with a way better battery lifetime than Motorola One Vision, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity. Galaxy F62 has a little bit better camera than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low-light images, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a much higher 64 MP resolution back facing camera and a bigger sensor providing a higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.