Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 has a general score of 88.1, which is slightly better than the Motorola razr (2020)'s 87 general score. Even being the best cellphone in our current comparison, the Galaxy F62 body is somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier than Motorola razr (2020). These phones come with the same Android 11 OS (operating system).
Motorola razr (2020) features a bit faster processor than Galaxy F62, because it has a higher number of cores and a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy F62 features a little more vivid display than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution, a bit bigger screen and a little bit greater quantity of pixels per display inch.
Galaxy F62 features more memory for apps and games than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy F62 features a slightly better camera than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for low light captures and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a way higher resolution back camera and a larger back-facing camera sensor.
The Galaxy F62 has a much better battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 150 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.