Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 15 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2025-04-24 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | -- |
| 7.69 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | -- |
| Super AMOLED Plus | LTPO |
| 393 pixels per inch | -- |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F62 has an overall score of 88.1, which is much better than the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025)'s 79.2 overall score. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy F62 has older 11 version and Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15 version. Samsung Galaxy F62 has a much better performing processing unit than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has 4 lesser CPU cores (but faster) and lesser RAM.
The Galaxy F62 features a much more vibrant screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has much worse brightness and a quite smaller display. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has more memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) and Samsung Galaxy F62 have similar cameras, because although the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a lot worse resolution camera, and they both have a same size camera aperture, it also counts with a much better 7680x4320 video resolution. The Galaxy F62 has a very superior battery performance than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), because it has a 49 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.