Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2020-11-12 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Meteor grey |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F62 is just a bit better than the Nokia 8 V 5G UW, getting an 88.1 score against 80.3. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy F62 has newer 11 version and Nokia 8 V 5G UW has Android 10 version. Even though the Samsung Galaxy F62 and the Nokia 8 V 5G UW were released only a couple months apart, Samsung Galaxy F62's body is a little lighter but also a little thicker.
Galaxy F62 and Nokia 8 V 5G UW feature really similar CPUs, and although the Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a greater number of cores (although they are slower), they both have 6 GB of RAM memory. Galaxy F62 has a bit sharper screen than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a just a bit greater display pixels density.
The Galaxy F62 features a greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1 TB. Nokia 8 V 5G UW shoots clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy F62, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the same video quality, a camera in the back with a 64 megapixels and the same back-facing camera sensor size, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has better 60 fps video frame rates.
Galaxy F62 features a much longer battery life than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.