Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-02-22 | 2019-03-03 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.99 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 is better than Nokia 9 PureView, getting a overall score of 88.1 against 76.4. Galaxy F62's design is newer than Nokia 9 PureView's, although it's thicker and much heavier. The Nokia 9 PureView features a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2880 resolution and a better pixels density.
The Nokia 9 PureView features just a bit better performance than Galaxy F62, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Nokia 9 PureView also has a higher number of cores. Samsung Galaxy F62 features a lot better camera than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a back-facing camera with much more MP and a lot larger sensor.
Samsung Galaxy F62 features a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has an external SD slot that allows up to 1 TB. The Galaxy F62 counts with a way better battery lifetime than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.