Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2021-07-29 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | -- |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.99 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy F62 is just a bit better than Nokia XR20, getting an 88.1 score against 80.8. The Samsung Galaxy F62 is a incredibly lighter and somewhat thinner cellphone than the Nokia XR20, even though both of them were released with only 5 months difference. Both of these phones use the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so both should provide you the same OS features.
The Nokia XR20 has a bit sharper screen than Galaxy F62, and although they both have a display of the same size, an equal 1080 x 2400 resolution and the same count of pixels per inch of display, the Nokia XR20 also has a brighter display. Galaxy F62 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Nokia XR20, although it has an inferior number of cores , they both have a 6 GB RAM memory.
Galaxy F62 counts with just a bit more storage to install games and applications than Nokia XR20, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy F62 also has a SD memory slot that supports up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy F62 features a superior camera than Nokia XR20, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a back facing camera with a lot better 64 MP resolution, a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a much larger back camera sensor providing a way higher image quality.
Samsung Galaxy F62 has a very superior battery life than Nokia XR20, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity against 4630mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.