Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-02-22 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Cyber shade |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 has a global score of 88.1, which is better than nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 global score. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy F62 has an older 11 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version. Even though Galaxy F62 is a little heavier than nubia Red Magic 3S, it's just a little bit thinner and also newer.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a bit better CPU than Galaxy F62, because it has a larger number of cores (and faster) and a higher amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy F62 has a bit sharper display than nubia Red Magic 3S, and although they both have a same size screen, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little higher pixels count per display inch.
Galaxy F62 features more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a way better battery duration than nubia Red Magic 3S, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity instead of 5000mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 has just a bit better camera than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low-light photos and video, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor shooting better quality photographs, faster video frame rate and a lot better 64 mega pixels resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.