Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Sonic silver |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy F62 has a score of 88.1, which is better than nubia Red Magic 5S's score of 76.2. Both devices in this comparison come with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy F62 has a newer 11 version while nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10. Even though the Samsung Galaxy F62 and the nubia Red Magic 5S were released with only 6 months difference, the Samsung Galaxy F62 is a little bit lighter and a little thinner.
Nubia Red Magic 5S has a bit better looking display than Galaxy F62, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a quite inferior pixels count in each screen inch, and they both have a display with the same size, the nubia Red Magic 5S also counts with more brightness. The nubia Red Magic 5S features just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy F62, because it has a higher number of cores (and faster) and a greater amount of RAM.
The Galaxy F62 has a much greater memory to store more games and applications than nubia Red Magic 5S, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Galaxy F62 also has a SD card slot that holds up to 1 TB. The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy F62, and although they both have the same back-facing camera sensor size, a F1.8 camera aperture and a same resolution camera in the back, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Galaxy F62 has a way better battery performance than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.