Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-02-22 | 2019-03-02 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.99 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 has a score of 88.1, which is much better than the Galaxy A30's 79.6 general score. Even though the Galaxy F62 is newer than Galaxy A30, it is somewhat thicker and extremely heavier. The Samsung Galaxy F62 features a little bit better performance than Galaxy A30, because although it has 4 less cores , it also counts with more RAM.
The Galaxy F62 has a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A30, because although it has a just a little worse pixel density, it also counts with a little larger screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px. The Galaxy F62 counts with a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A30, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1 TB and more internal storage.
The Galaxy F62 shoots a lot better photos and videos than Galaxy A30, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light images and video, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a much larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a camera in the back with a lot better resolution.
Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a very superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A30, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.