Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2020-04-27 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.99 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 has a score of 88.1, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A31's global score of 81.3. Both of these devices have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy F62 has a newer 11 version and Samsung Galaxy A31 has Android 10. Galaxy F62's construction is newer, but somewhat heavier and just a little thicker than the Samsung Galaxy A31.
The Galaxy F62 has a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A31, because although it has 4 lesser CPU cores , it also counts with more RAM memory. Galaxy F62 has a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A31, because although it has a little worse screen density, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a quite larger screen.
Galaxy F62 counts with a much better camera than Galaxy A31, because it has a much higher video definition, a way more MP camera in the back, a bigger aperture to take better captures and videos in low-light environments and a larger back-facing camera sensor capturing better quality videos and photos.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 has a lot bigger memory for apps and games than Galaxy A31, because it has more internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy F62 features a much better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A31, because it has a 40% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.