Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.99 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F62 is better than the Galaxy A35 5G, getting a score of 88.1 against 79.4. Both phones in this review work with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy F62 has the previous 11 version and Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14 version. The Samsung Galaxy F62 is a better cellphone than the Galaxy A35 5G, we must highlight that it is also an extremely older, just a bit heavier and somewhat thicker cellphone.
The Galaxy F62 counts with an extremely better processor than Galaxy A35 5G, although it has a lower number of cores , they both have 6 GB of RAM. Galaxy F62 counts with a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has less brightness, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the display, a little bit larger screen and a quite better 1080 x 2400px resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a much better 64 mega-pixels resolution back camera and a bigger sensor taking higher quality photographs.
Galaxy F62 counts with a way bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy F62 also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1 TB. The Galaxy F62 features a way better battery life than Galaxy A35 5G, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.