Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-02-22 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy F62 is a bit better than the Galaxy A50, with an 88.1 score against 83.8. The Samsung Galaxy F62 body is newer, but way heavier and thicker than Galaxy A50. The Samsung Galaxy F62 has a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a little bit lower screen pixels density, it also counts with a quite bigger display and a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The Galaxy F62 counts with a slightly bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Galaxy F62 also has a SD memory slot that admits up to 1 TB. Galaxy A50's processing unit is just as good as the CPU in Galaxy F62, because although the Galaxy A50 has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with more processing cores.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 takes much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for low-light images, it also counts with a much higher video resolution, a back camera with a much better resolution and a way larger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot higher quality photos.
The Galaxy F62 has a very superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.