Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A51, with a overall score of 88.1 against 85.5. Galaxy F62's design is newer, but somewhat thicker and incredibly heavier than the Samsung Galaxy A51. Both devices in our current comparison work with the same Android 11 OS (operating system). The Samsung Galaxy A51 has a CPU that is very similar to the processor in Galaxy F62, because although the Samsung Galaxy A51 has lesser RAM, it also counts with a larger number of cores (but slower).
The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A51, because although it has a little less pixels per inch in the screen, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also counts with a quite bigger screen. Galaxy F62 features a slightly better camera than Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Galaxy F62 also has a much better resolution camera in the back, a larger back-facing camera sensor capturing better quality photographs and videos and a larger aperture to capture better low light photography.
Samsung Galaxy F62 has a bit more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy A51, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy F62 counts with a really longer battery duration than Galaxy A51, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.