Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Prism cube black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 5G has an overall score of 90.8, which is slightly better than the Galaxy F62's general score of 88.1. These phones have the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't see any difference regarding OS features. Despite of the fact that Galaxy A51 5G is older than Galaxy F62, it's design is somewhat lighter and just a bit thinner.
Galaxy F62 and Samsung Galaxy A51 5G have quite similar CPUs, and although the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has more processing cores , they both have 6 GB of RAM memory. The Galaxy F62 counts with a bit better display than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a bit less pixels per inch of display, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a quite larger display.
Galaxy F62 features a slightly better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Galaxy F62 also has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy F62 features a much better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a 56% larger battery size.
The Galaxy F62 shoots clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy F62 also has a bigger aperture, a back facing camera with much more MP and a larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.