Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy F62, having a 91.3 score against 88.1. Even when the Galaxy A52 5G and the Samsung Galaxy F62 were released with only a couple of months difference, the Galaxy A52 5G is somewhat thinner and lighter. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A52 5G has the newer 12 version while Samsung Galaxy F62 has Android 11.
Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a just a little worse screen pixels density, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also counts with a little bigger screen. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a CPU that's just as good as Galaxy F62's CPU, and although the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has more cores , they both have 6 GB of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G captures a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy F62. Both of them have a camera in the back with a 64 megapixels, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, a F1.8 camera aperture, a 0.59 inches sensor and the same (4K) video quality. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G and Samsung Galaxy F62 feature quite similar memory to store more apps and games, both of them have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity and a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy F62 counts with a very superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a 7000mAh battery size instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.