Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52s is slightly better than the Galaxy F62, with a general score of 91.1 against 88.1. Although Galaxy A52s and Galaxy F62 were released with only 6 months difference, Galaxy A52s is lighter and somewhat thinner. These devices include the same Android 11 operating system. Galaxy F62 counts with a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch in the display, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2400px resolution, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a little larger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 and the Galaxy A52s count with very similar memory for applications and games, both of them have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage and a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A52s has just a little better performance than Galaxy F62, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has a larger number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy F62. Both of them have the same video frame rate, the same video resolution, a F1.8 diafragm aperture, a camera with a 64 mega-pixels resolution and a 0.59 inches sensor. Galaxy F62 counts with a way better battery life than Galaxy A52s, because it has a 7000mAh battery size against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.