Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-02-22 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 is much better than Galaxy A70, getting a global score of 88.1 against 76.9. The Galaxy F62 is a newer phone than Galaxy A70, although it is somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier. These devices use Android operating system, but Galaxy F62 has 11 version while Galaxy A70 has Android 10, so it provides you some extra features.
Galaxy F62 counts with a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A70. They have a higher number of pixels per inch of screen, an equal 1080 x 2400px resolution and a display with the same size. The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a little bit better storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy A70, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has an external memory card slot that admits up to 1 TB.
The Galaxy F62 has a bit better processing power than Galaxy A70, although it has 4 less cores (but faster), they both have a 6 GB RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy F62 shoots much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also counts with a much bigger sensor which provides a lot higher image and video quality.
Samsung Galaxy F62 features a much longer battery duration than Galaxy A70, because it has a 56 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.