Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Prism bricks black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a general score of 92.9, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy F62's general score of 88.1. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a lighter and somewhat thinner device than the Samsung Galaxy F62, although both were released only 7 months apart. Both devices we are comparing include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has the older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy F62 has Android 11 version.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a little bit better screen than Galaxy A71 5G UW. Both of them have a same size display, exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and the same pixels density. The Galaxy A71 5G UW features a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy F62, because it has a larger number of cores and 2 GB more RAM.
The Galaxy F62 counts with a bit more memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy F62 also has a SD card slot that supports up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A71 5G UW features just a bit better camera than Galaxy F62. Both of them have the same diafragm aperture, a same resolution back-facing camera, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, a same size back-facing camera sensor and the same (4K) video definition.
Galaxy F62 has a very superior battery duration than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.