Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-02-22 | 2018-01-06 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.87 x 2.78 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Black, Blue, Gold and Orchid grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Mali-G71 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.99 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F62 has an overall score of 88.1, which is better than Galaxy A8 (2018)'s overall score of 79.2. The Samsung Galaxy F62 design is extremely newer, but noticeably heavier and somewhat thicker than Galaxy A8 (2018). Samsung Galaxy F62 has a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A8 (2018), because although it has a just a little lower display density, it also counts with a larger display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400.
Samsung Galaxy F62 has a superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy F62 counts with a little faster CPU than Galaxy A8 (2018), because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 captures greater pictures and videos than Galaxy A8 (2018), because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a lot more mega-pixels camera and a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition. The Galaxy F62 features a really longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A8 (2018), because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.