Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-02-22 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is better than Galaxy F62, with a 97.6 score against 88.1. Both devices in this comparison include Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Fold has the newer 9.0 Pie version while Galaxy F62 has Android 11, so it gives you lots of additional features and performance optimizations. The Samsung Galaxy Fold body is extremely thinner than the Galaxy F62, although it is noticeably heavier and was released around a year before.
The Galaxy F62 has a little bit better looking display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2400px resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little higher number of pixels in each inch of screen. The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy F62, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy Fold has a bit faster CPU than Galaxy F62, because it has a larger amount of RAM and 4 more cpu cores. The Galaxy F62 captures better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low-light images and video and lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a back camera with lot more mega pixels and a much larger camera sensor capturing much higher quality photographs and videos.
The Galaxy F62 has a much longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Fold, because it has a 7000mAh battery size instead of 4380mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.