Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2021-02-22 | 2019-02-05 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.99 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 has a score of 88.1, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy M20's global score of 78.9. Galaxy F62 is a incredibly newer phone than Samsung Galaxy M20, but it is a little thicker and heavier. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy F62 has newer 11 version while Samsung Galaxy M20 has Android 10 version, so it gives you some additional features and performance enhancements.
Galaxy F62 features a little bit better performance than Galaxy M20, because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with 2 GB more RAM. Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy M20, because although it has a little bit worse display pixel density, it also counts with a quite larger display and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400.
Galaxy F62 counts with a much better camera than Galaxy M20, because it has a way higher video definition, a bigger aperture for better images and video in poorly lited environments, a camera with a lot higher 64 megapixels resolution and a lot bigger sensor providing a way better image quality. The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M20, because it has 64 GB more internal memory and a SD memory slot that admits up to 1 TB.
Galaxy F62 counts with a superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy M20, because it has a 7000mAh battery size instead of 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.