Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Black and White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.99 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 has a general score of 88.1, which is a bit better than the Galaxy M51's general score of 87.7. The Galaxy F62 construction has the same thickness than Galaxy M51, but it's just a little bit heavier. These devices work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy F62 has the newer 11 version while Galaxy M51 has Android 10 version.
The Galaxy F62 has a little more vivid display than Galaxy M51, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Galaxy F62 also has a little better screen pixels density and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. The Galaxy F62 counts with a little bit more memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy M51, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy F62 also has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
Galaxy M51 features a processing unit that is very similar to the processor in Samsung Galaxy F62, and although the Galaxy M51 has 4 more cpu cores , they both have 6 GB of RAM. Samsung Galaxy F62 has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy M51, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, a F1.8 aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a back-facing camera with a 64 megapixels resolution, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy F62 and the Samsung Galaxy M51 both have incredibly similar batteries.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.