Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-02-22 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy F62, getting a 90.8 score against 88.1. Galaxy Note 20's body is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than the Samsung Galaxy F62, even when both were released only 6 months apart. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy F62, because it has 2 GB more RAM memory and a greater number of cores.
The Galaxy F62 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Note 20. Both have the same display pixels density, the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a display with the same size. The Samsung Galaxy F62 has a much better memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
Galaxy F62 counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have the same camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy F62 also has a camera with a way better 64 MP resolution, better video frame rate and a bigger sensor providing a higher image quality.
Samsung Galaxy F62 has a much better battery life than Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 63 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.