Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a global score of 98.9, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy F62's 88.1 overall score. Both devices we compare here work with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has 13 version while Samsung Galaxy F62 has Android 11 version, counting with some additional features. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's design is a little lighter and somewhat thinner than the Samsung Galaxy F62, although they were only released with a couple of months difference.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy F62, because it has a bit bigger screen, a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution and a better amount of pixels per inch in the screen. The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a little bit better storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy F62, because it has a higher number of cores (and faster) and 6 GB more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra shoots much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy F62, and although they both have the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a much larger sensor shooting way better quality photos and videos, a way higher 7680x4320 video definition and a much better 108 megapixels resolution camera.
The Galaxy F62 counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 7000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.