Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 8.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note 3, getting an 88.1 score against 81.2. Galaxy F62's design is incredibly newer, but somewhat thicker and a lot heavier than the Samsung Galaxy Note 3. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy F62 has newer 11 version and Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has Android 5.0.
Galaxy Note 3 has a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy F62, although it has a bit lower number of pixels per inch of screen, a little smaller screen and a little bit worse 1920 x 1080px resolution. Galaxy Note 3 features a processing unit that's just as good as the processing unit in Galaxy F62, because although the Galaxy Note 3 has lesser RAM memory, and they both have a Quad-Core processing unit, it also counts with an additional graphics co-processor.
Galaxy F62 has a lot bigger storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory. Galaxy F62 has a much better camera than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy F62 also has a lot bigger back camera sensor, a bigger aperture for better images and videos in poorly lited situations and a lot more mega pixels back camera.
Samsung Galaxy F62 has a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.