Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 5.1 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| -- | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.4 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 8.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 is better than Galaxy Note 5, getting an 88.1 score against 79.3. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy F62 has 11 version and Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1, providing you lots of additional features. Galaxy F62's construction is noticeably newer, but a lot heavier and thicker than Galaxy Note 5.
The Galaxy F62 counts with a little better hardware performance than Galaxy Note 5, because it has more RAM memory and 3 more processing cores. The Galaxy Note 5 has a much better display than Galaxy F62, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixels number in each inch of display and a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution.
The Galaxy F62 counts with a much greater memory for games and applications than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a much better camera than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a way larger sensor, a lot higher resolution camera and a bigger camera aperture for better low light images and video.
Galaxy F62 has a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.