Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-02-22 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.99 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy F62 has a score of 88.1, which is slightly better than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition's 80.4 global score. The Samsung Galaxy F62 is a newer cellphone than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, although it is thicker and incredibly heavier. Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and more pixels per display inch.
The Galaxy F62 has a much better memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1 TB and more internal memory. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition's processing unit is just as good as the Galaxy F62 one, because although the Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a larger number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 shoots way better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light photos, and they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also counts with a camera in the back with a way higher resolution and a much larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Galaxy F62 has a much longer battery performance than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 119 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.