Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-02-22 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 has an overall score of 89, which is a little bit better than Galaxy F62's overall score of 88.1. Although the Galaxy Note10 is older than the Galaxy F62, it's construction is way lighter and somewhat thinner. Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a quite lower pixels density, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2400px resolution and a little bit larger display.
Samsung Galaxy F62 has a greater memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note10, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a little bit better processing power than Galaxy F62, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and a higher number of faster cores.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 takes better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note10, because although it has slower video frame rate and a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low-light captures and video, and they both have the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also counts with a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Galaxy F62 has a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note10, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.