Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2020-01-21 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, with an 88.1 score against 86.2. Even though Galaxy F62 is newer than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, it's a little heavier and just a little bit thicker. Both phones in this comparison include the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't see any difference in that aspect.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has a bit better processor than Galaxy F62, and although they both have a 6 GB RAM, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite also has a higher number of cores. The Galaxy F62 has a little sharper display than Galaxy Note10 Lite. Both of them have a same size display, the same screen density and exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
Samsung Galaxy F62 has a superior camera than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has worse video frame rates and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for capturing pictures and videos in low light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also counts with a lot larger camera sensor which gives a lot higher image and video quality and a way better 64 megapixels resolution camera in the back.
Galaxy F62 has a bit bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note10 Lite, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy F62 also has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a very superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.