Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 has an overall score of 88.1, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy Note3's 77.7 global score. Galaxy F62's body is newer, but incredibly heavier and somewhat thicker than Samsung Galaxy Note3. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy F62 has the older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy Note3 has Android 4.4.2 version.
The Galaxy F62 features a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have 4 cores, the Galaxy F62 also has more RAM. Galaxy F62 counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy Note3, because it has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400, a little bit better screen density and a bigger screen.
The Galaxy F62 counts with a way better camera than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy F62 also has a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution, a larger camera aperture to take better low-light photos and a much larger sensor.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 has a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note3, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy F62 features a way better battery duration than Galaxy Note3, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.