Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-02-22 | 2014-09-29 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Black, Gold, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Mali-T760 MP6 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F62 is better than the Galaxy Note4, with an 88.1 score against 77.6. Samsung Galaxy F62's construction is extremely newer, but thicker and somewhat heavier than the Galaxy Note4. The Galaxy Note4 counts with a little bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixels number per inch in the display and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Galaxy F62 features a little better hardware performance than Galaxy Note4, because although it has 4 lesser processing cores (but faster), it also counts with more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy F62 features a much better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because it has a 117% bigger battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy F62 takes way better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note4, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a larger aperture for better photos and videos in poorly lited environments, a way better 64 mega pixels resolution back facing camera and a much bigger back camera sensor capturing way higher quality videos and photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.