Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-02-22 | 2015-08-21 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 has a score of 88.1, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy Note5's 80.2 overall score. Galaxy F62 is a notably newer phone than the Samsung Galaxy Note5, but it is notably heavier and thicker. The Galaxy F62 counts with a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because although it has an inferior number of cores , it also counts with more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Note5 has a little sharper screen than Galaxy F62, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px. The Galaxy F62 counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note5, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy F62 also has a bigger diafragm aperture, a lot more MP back facing camera and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor capturing lot better quality photos.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note5, because it has 128 GB internal storage and an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy F62 features a very superior battery performance than Galaxy Note5, because it has a 7000mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.