Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-02-22 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.99 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 has a score of 88.1, which is much better than Galaxy Note7's general score of 79.5. The Galaxy F62 construction is incredibly newer, but somewhat thicker and noticeably heavier than Galaxy Note7. Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a bit better CPU than Galaxy Note7, and although they both have 4 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Note7 features just a bit better looking display than Galaxy F62, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better screen pixel density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px. Samsung Galaxy F62 has a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Note7, because it has an external memory card slot that admits up to 1 TB and 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy F62 takes much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for shooting photos in low light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a lot more MP back facing camera and a lot bigger sensor shooting much better quality videos and pictures.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a much longer battery life than Galaxy Note7, because it has a 100% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.