Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-02-22 | 2017-09-15 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Deep Sea blue, Maple gold, Midnight black and Orchid gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 440.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 has a general score of 88.1, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy Note8's 83 global score. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but the Galaxy F62 has 11 version while Galaxy Note8 has Android 9.0 Pie. Galaxy F62's design is extremely newer, but somewhat heavier and a bit thicker than Galaxy Note8.
The Galaxy Note8 has a bit better processing power than Galaxy F62, and although they both have a 6 GB RAM, the Galaxy Note8 also has a higher number of cores (although slower). The Galaxy Note8 has a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960px and a higher number of pixels per inch of screen.
Galaxy F62 counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy Note8, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low light images, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a camera in the back with a way better resolution and a lot bigger sensor.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 features a much better storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note8, because it has a SD extension slot that allows up to 1 TB and more internal memory capacity. Galaxy F62 counts with a really longer battery life than Galaxy Note8, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.