Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-02-22 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 is slightly better than the Galaxy F62, with an 88.3 score against 88.1. These phones come with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so both should offer identical OS features. The Samsung Galaxy S10 construction is thinner and lighter than the Galaxy F62, even though it was released many years before.
Samsung Galaxy S10 has a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy F62, because it has more cores and a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy S10 has a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3040 resolution and more pixels per inch in the display.
Samsung Galaxy F62 features a little bit better memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S10, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy F62 counts with a much better battery life than Galaxy S10, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity against 3400mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a much better camera than Galaxy S10, because although it has a tinier camera aperture and lower video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also counts with a camera with much more MP and a lot larger camera sensor which offers a much higher photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.