Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-02-22 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a global score of 93.6, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy F62's 88.1 global score. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G's construction is thinner and a little bit lighter than Samsung Galaxy F62, even though it was released around 22 months before. These phones use the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't see any difference regarding OS features.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a bit better looking screen than Galaxy F62, and although they both have a same size screen, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G also has a greater number of pixels per inch in the display and a higher 1440 x 3040px resolution. The Galaxy F62 has a better storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a bit better processing unit than Galaxy F62, because it has a larger number of cores (and faster) and more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy F62 features a very superior battery life than Galaxy S10 5G, because it has a 56 percent more battery capacity. The Galaxy F62 counts with a superior camera than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for shooting photographs and/or video in low-light situations and lower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a much bigger sensor which gives a much better photo and video quality and a camera in the back with much more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.