Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-02-22 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 Lite is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy F62, getting a global score of 89.7 against 88.1. The Galaxy S10 Lite design is somewhat lighter and thinner than Samsung Galaxy F62, even though it was released about 13 months before. The Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy F62, because it has a greater number of cores and a higher amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy F62 features a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy S10 Lite. Both of them have a screen of the same size, an equal 1080 x 2400 resolution and a higher pixel amount in each inch of screen. Galaxy F62 features a bit bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy S10 Lite, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy F62 also has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite's camera is very similar to the Galaxy F62 one, although the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a camera in the back with a lot worse resolution, a tinier aperture which is not so good for capturing photos and/or video in low light environments, a smaller sensor shooting lower quality videos and images and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
The Galaxy F62 counts with a superior battery duration than Galaxy S10 Lite, because it has a 7000mAh battery size against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.