Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-02-22 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 has an overall score of 88.1, which is just a bit better than Galaxy S10e's 86.3 score. The Galaxy F62 body is newer, but thicker and a lot heavier than Galaxy S10e. Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy F62, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has more cpu cores.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 features just a bit better looking display than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a little lower display density, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a bigger display. Galaxy F62 features a slightly bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S10e, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Galaxy F62 also has a SD extension slot that holds up to 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light photography and slower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also counts with a much higher resolution camera in the back and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 features a way better battery duration than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 7000mAh battery size instead of 3100mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.