Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 has a general score of 94.8, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy F62's 88.1 global score. The Samsung Galaxy S20 design is a lot lighter and somewhat thinner than the Samsung Galaxy F62, even though it was released about 12 months before. Both devices in our current comparison use Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S20 has newer 13 version and Samsung Galaxy F62 has Android 11 version.
The Galaxy S20 counts with a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3200 resolution and more pixels per inch of display. Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a little bit better storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S20, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1 TB.
Galaxy S20 counts with just a bit better processing power than Galaxy F62, because it has a higher number of cores and 6 GB more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a superior battery life than Galaxy S20, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy F62 shoots much better photographs and videos than Galaxy S20, and although they both have a 0.59 inches back camera sensor, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a way more MP camera in the back and higher 30 frames per second video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.