Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 FE is just a bit better than Galaxy F62, getting a general score of 90.8 against 88.1. The Galaxy S20 FE is a somewhat thinner and lighter phone than Galaxy F62, even when both were released with only 5 months difference. Both phones in this review have the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't see any differences regarding that.
The Galaxy S20 FE features a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy F62, and although they both have a 6 GB RAM memory, the Galaxy S20 FE also has 4 more cpu cores. The Samsung Galaxy F62 features a little bit better display than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a quite worse screen pixel density, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also counts with a little larger screen.
Galaxy F62 captures much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a same size diafragm aperture, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a camera with much more megapixels.
Galaxy F62 features just a bit more memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy F62 also has an external SD slot that allows up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because it has a 7000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.