Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is better than Samsung Galaxy F62, having a 98 score against 88.1. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's design is a little bit thinner than Samsung Galaxy F62, but it is just a little bit heavier and was released just 12 months before. These phones work with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has 13 version and Samsung Galaxy F62 has Android 11, so it offers lots of additional features.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy F62, because it has a larger number of cores and a larger amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy F62, because it has a higher pixels quantity in each inch in the screen, a better 1440 x 3200 resolution and a little larger display.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a better camera than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a smaller sensor capturing lower quality videos and photographs, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with a lot more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a much better 7680x4320 video resolution.
The Galaxy F62 features just a bit bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy F62 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy F62 features a way better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.