Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-02-22 | -- |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | -- |
| 7.69 ounces | -- |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | -- |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 is just a bit better than Galaxy S25, getting a score of 88.1 against 82.6. Both phones in this comparison use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy F62 has 11 version while Galaxy S25 has Android 14 version. Samsung Galaxy S25 features a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a little higher count of pixels in each screen inch and a lot brighter screen.
The Galaxy F62 counts with a much greater hardware performance than Galaxy S25, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory and a lower number of cores (although faster). The Galaxy S25 shoots clearer videos and photos than Galaxy F62, because although it has a back-facing camera with a lot worse resolution, and they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy S25 also counts with a larger sensor shooting higher quality photographs and a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
The Galaxy F62 has a much greater storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S25, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Galaxy F62 also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1 TB. Galaxy F62 counts with a really longer battery life than Galaxy S25, because it has a 7000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.