Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-02-22 | -- |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | -- |
| 7.69 ounces | -- |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | -- |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra has a score of 90.7, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy F62's 88.1 general score. These phones have Android operating system, but the Galaxy S25 Ultra has 14 version while Samsung Galaxy F62 has Android 11. The Galaxy S25 Ultra is a a lot thinner and lighter device than the Samsung Galaxy F62.
The Galaxy F62 counts with a much more powerful processing unit than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has 6 GB lesser RAM and a lower number of cores. Galaxy S25 Ultra has a way better display than Samsung Galaxy F62, because it has a lot brighter display, a better pixel amount per inch in the display, a little bit bigger display and a better resolution of 1440 x 3088px.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy F62, because it has a way bigger sensor capturing much higher quality videos and pictures, a way better video quality, a way better 200 mega pixels resolution back facing camera and a larger aperture to take better low-light photography and video.
Samsung Galaxy F62 features more memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy F62 features a much better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, because it has a 40 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.