Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-02-22 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F62 is much better than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, with a general score of 88.1 against 75.8. The Samsung Galaxy F62 body is noticeably newer and just a bit thinner than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's, although it is also heavier. Galaxy S7 Active counts with a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution, a greater pixels count in each inch of screen and a little bit more brightness.
The Galaxy F62 has a little better hardware performance than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have 4 cpu cores, the Galaxy F62 also has more RAM. Samsung Galaxy F62 features a superior storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has more internal memory and an external memory slot that supports up to 1 TB.
Galaxy F62 features a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for taking images or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a back camera with lot more megapixels.
Samsung Galaxy F62 has a superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 75% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.