Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2021-02-22 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 is much better than Galaxy S7 edge, with a global score of 88.1 against 78.1. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS, but Galaxy F62 has older 11 version while Galaxy S7 edge has Android 8.0 Oreo. Galaxy F62 is a newer cellphone than the Galaxy S7 edge, but it is a lot heavier and thicker.
The Galaxy F62 counts with a little better performance than Galaxy S7 edge, and although they both have 4 cores, the Galaxy F62 also has 2 GB more RAM. Galaxy S7 edge has a slightly better looking display than Galaxy F62, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a better 1440 x 2560px resolution.
Galaxy F62 captures much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for low-light photography, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a much larger sensor capturing lot higher quality photos and videos and a camera in the back with a lot higher resolution.
Galaxy F62 has a way bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has more internal memory and a SD extension slot that allows up to 1 TB. Galaxy F62 counts with a really longer battery performance than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a 7000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.